Rating Review

Share Rating Review on Facebook Share Rating Review on Twitter Share Rating Review on Linkedin Email Rating Review link

Consultation has concluded.

All feedback received through the consultation will be collated and presented to Council for further consideration and future direction.

The City of Victor Harbor will make no changes to its rating structure following the completion on its Rating Review in May 2021.

The Council considered the final report at its ordinary council meeting on 24 May and made the decision to retain its current rating structure as follows:

  • Commercial Differential at 130%
  • Industry Differential at 115%
  • Primary Production Differential at 90%
  • Vacant Land at 150%
  • Fixed Charge
  • Rate capping at 15% (where appropriate)

Background

Councils are responsible for the delivery of a broad range of services to their communities. These services can vary as each community is unique and has different priorities. Councils receive income from a number of sources to pay for the services they provide, and the largest revenue source is rates.

The Local Government Act 1999 allows councils to raise rates and provides a degree of flexibility in the options used by councils to do this. Council have a responsibility to determine the best method for their communities, and review this from time to time to ensure the system used is relevant.

The City of Victor Harbor has recently completed a review of its rating structure. It is important to note that the review was not about increasing or decreasing Council rates, it looked at how rates are distributed across land use types.

The review included a number of Elected Member workshops and a public consultation period that sought the views of the City of Victor Harbor community.


The City of Victor Harbor will make no changes to its rating structure following the completion on its Rating Review in May 2021.

The Council considered the final report at its ordinary council meeting on 24 May and made the decision to retain its current rating structure as follows:

  • Commercial Differential at 130%
  • Industry Differential at 115%
  • Primary Production Differential at 90%
  • Vacant Land at 150%
  • Fixed Charge
  • Rate capping at 15% (where appropriate)

Background

Councils are responsible for the delivery of a broad range of services to their communities. These services can vary as each community is unique and has different priorities. Councils receive income from a number of sources to pay for the services they provide, and the largest revenue source is rates.

The Local Government Act 1999 allows councils to raise rates and provides a degree of flexibility in the options used by councils to do this. Council have a responsibility to determine the best method for their communities, and review this from time to time to ensure the system used is relevant.

The City of Victor Harbor has recently completed a review of its rating structure. It is important to note that the review was not about increasing or decreasing Council rates, it looked at how rates are distributed across land use types.

The review included a number of Elected Member workshops and a public consultation period that sought the views of the City of Victor Harbor community.


  • CLOSED: This survey has concluded.

    Please note that your responses may form part of a future Council agenda.

    Consultation has concluded.

    All feedback received through the consultation will be collated and presented to Council for further consideration and future direction.

    Share Rating Review Survey on Facebook Share Rating Review Survey on Twitter Share Rating Review Survey on Linkedin Email Rating Review Survey link
  • CLOSED: This survey has concluded.

    Use this form to lodge your written submission in regards to Council's rating review.

    Submissions are preferred in .pdf or .doc (word) formats.

    Consultation has concluded.

    All feedback received through the consultation will be collated and presented to Council for further consideration and future direction.

    Share Written Submissions - Rating Review on Facebook Share Written Submissions - Rating Review on Twitter Share Written Submissions - Rating Review on Linkedin Email Written Submissions - Rating Review link